{"id":42922,"date":"2024-09-13T08:56:42","date_gmt":"2024-09-13T07:56:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/clinical-performance-of-extra-short-%e2%89%a45-5-mm-compared-to-longer-implants-splinted-under-the-same-prosthesis-a-randomized-clinical-trial\/"},"modified":"2025-08-18T09:22:51","modified_gmt":"2025-08-18T08:22:51","slug":"clinical-performance-of-extra-short-%e2%89%a45-5-mm-compared-to-longer-implants-splinted-under-the-same-prosthesis-a-randomized-clinical-trial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/clinical-performance-of-extra-short-%e2%89%a45-5-mm-compared-to-longer-implants-splinted-under-the-same-prosthesis-a-randomized-clinical-trial\/","title":{"rendered":"Clinical Performance of Extra-Short (\u22645.5 mm) Compared to Longer Implants Splinted under the Same Prosthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row content_text_aligment=”left” row_background_lines=”no”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]<\/p>\n

Abstract<\/h3>\n
\n
\n

Objective: <\/strong>This randomized controlled split-mouth trial compared the performance of 5.5 mm length implants (test group; TG) splinted within the same fixed prosthesis as longer implants (\u22656.5 mm; control group; CG) in posterior regions.<\/p>\n

Methods:\u00a0<\/strong>The primary hypothesis was that implant length does not affect marginal bone loss (MBL) one year post-implantation, while the secondary hypotheses included implant survival, peri-implant clinical variables, and prosthetic complications. Fifteen patients (eight males, seven females) with a mean age of 67 \u00b1 9 years were included.<\/p>\n

Results:\u00a0<\/strong>No significant difference in the implant position between groups (p = 0.808) was observed. Implant diameters ranged from 3.00 to 4.25 mm, and the most common bone type was type I (67%). Bone density (p = 0.574) and implant insertion torque (p = 0.888) were similar between groups. Mesial MBL (mean: -0.1; range: -1.19 to 0.24 for TG, and -0.03; -1.75 to 0.45 for CG; p = 0.955) and distal MBL (mean: -0.05; range: -1.41 to 0.27 for TG, and 0.08; -1.45 to 0.72 for CG; p = 0.118) did not show statistical differences. There were no implant failures or technical complications.<\/p>\n

Conclusions:\u00a0<\/strong>These findings suggest that 5.5 mm length implants could be a viable option for use in posterior regions, providing similar clinical outcomes to longer implants one year post-implantation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Keywords:\u00a0<\/strong>RCT; dental implant; implant survival; marginal bone loss; short implants.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Figures<\/h3>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row content_placement=”middle” content_text_aligment=”center”][vc_column]

\n\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>[vc_empty_space height=”50px”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column]\n T\u00e9l\u00e9charger l'article<\/span>\n <\/a>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 13;12(9):292.<\/strong>
\nThis randomized controlled split-mouth trial compared the performance of 5.5 mm length implants (test group; TG) splinted within the same fixed prosthesis as longer implants (\u22656.5 mm; control group; CG) in posterior regions. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2002,"featured_media":42895,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[151],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42922","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-implantologie-orale"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2002"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42922"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42922\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42923,"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42922\/revisions\/42923"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42895"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42922"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.btitrainingcenter.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}